All Publications
6 min read

Commerce Issues Final Rebar Antidumping and CVD Determinations for Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam: Rates Up to 136.57% with USITC Injury Review Pending | ULF New York

Regulatory Monitoring

Commerce Issues Final Rebar Antidumping and CVD Determinations for Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam: Rates Up to 136.57% with USITC Injury Review Pending

The U.S. Department of Commerce issued final affirmative antidumping and countervailing duty determinations covering steel concrete reinforcing bar from Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam. Rates range from 23.27% (Egypt CVD) to 136.57% (Vietnam-wide antidumping entity). These are final Commerce determinations, not yet final duty orders — the USITC must still make affirmative injury determinations, generally within 45 days, before orders can be issued. Antidumping suspension of liquidation generally covers entries made on or after March 13, 2026.

6 min read

Determination Summary

Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
Product: Steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar)
Countries: Bulgaria; Egypt; Vietnam
Status: Final Commerce determinations — USITC injury review pending
Suspension of Liquidation: Antidumping proceedings generally cover entries made on or after March 13, 2026

Final Rates

Bulgaria — Antidumping

ExporterRate
Promet Steel53.27%
All other exporters53.27%

Egypt — Antidumping

ExporterRate
Ezz Group34.20%
El Marakby Steel52.73%
Suez Steel52.73%
All other exporters34.20%

Egypt — Countervailing Duty

Rate
23.27%

Vietnam — Antidumping

ExporterRate
Hoa Phat128.53%
Vietnam-wide entity136.57%

Note: Vietnam rates are subject to applicable subsidy-offset mechanics.

Vietnam — Countervailing Duty

Rate
6.80%

Legal Analysis

Procedural Posture: Final Commerce Determinations, Not Final Orders

These are final determinations by the Department of Commerce — they are not yet final antidumping or countervailing duty orders. Before duty orders can be issued, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) must make affirmative determinations that the domestic rebar industry is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of the subject imports. The USITC generally has 45 days from the date of Commerce's final determinations to issue its injury determinations.

If the USITC makes affirmative injury determinations, Commerce will issue antidumping and countervailing duty orders, and the rates in those orders will apply to all subject entries made on or after the date of suspension of liquidation. If the USITC makes negative injury determinations, the proceedings will be terminated and no duty orders will be issued.

Suspension of Liquidation

Suspension of liquidation is a critical procedural mechanism in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings. When Commerce issues a preliminary affirmative determination, it instructs U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all subject entries — meaning that CBP will not finalize the duty assessment on those entries until the proceedings are complete.

For the antidumping proceedings, suspension of liquidation generally covers entries made on or after March 13, 2026. This means that rebar imported from Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam on or after March 13, 2026 is subject to potential antidumping duty liability, even if it was imported before Commerce issued its final determinations.

The countervailing duty proceedings have separate provisional-measures periods, which may result in different suspension-of-liquidation dates for CVD purposes.

Cash Deposit Requirements

Following Commerce's final determinations, importers of subject rebar must post cash deposits equal to the applicable antidumping and countervailing duty rates on all new entries. The cash deposit requirement applies immediately upon Commerce's final determination — importers cannot wait for the USITC's injury determination before posting deposits.

If the USITC makes negative injury determinations, Commerce will instruct CBP to refund the cash deposits (with interest) and terminate the suspension of liquidation. If the USITC makes affirmative injury determinations, the cash deposits will be applied against the final duty liability.

Customs Bond Sufficiency

The suspension of liquidation and cash deposit requirements create significant financial exposure for importers. Importers should assess whether their existing customs bonds are sufficient to cover the potential duty liability on all suspended entries. Insufficient bonding can result in CBP requiring additional security or refusing to release future entries.

Scope of the Proceedings

The scope of antidumping and countervailing duty orders is defined by the product description in the order. Importers should verify that their products fall within the scope of the rebar proceedings before assuming that the rates apply. Key scope issues include:

Product specifications: The scope typically covers steel concrete reinforcing bar meeting specific dimensional and compositional requirements. Products that do not meet these specifications may be outside the scope.

Country of origin: The country of origin for customs purposes may differ from the country of manufacture if the rebar has been processed in a third country. Importers should verify the country of origin of their products.

Circumvention: Commerce has authority to find that imports of products that are slightly modified or processed in third countries are circumventing an antidumping or countervailing duty order. Importers should be aware of this risk if they source rebar from third countries that process Bulgarian, Egyptian, or Vietnamese rebar.

Compliance Obligations

Immediate Actions for Importers

Verify product scope: Confirm that imported rebar falls within the scope of the proceedings by reviewing the scope language in Commerce's final determinations.

Review entries from March 13, 2026: Identify all rebar entries from Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam made on or after March 13, 2026. These entries are subject to potential antidumping duty liability.

Assess customs bond sufficiency: Calculate the potential duty liability on all suspended entries and verify that existing customs bonds are sufficient to cover this liability.

Model landed costs: Calculate the potential landed cost of rebar from affected countries assuming the final duty rates apply. This analysis is essential for pricing decisions and contract negotiations.

Contract Review

Supply contracts: Supply contracts for rebar from affected countries should be reviewed for duty-allocation provisions. Contracts that do not address the risk of antidumping and countervailing duties may leave importers exposed to significant unallocated costs.

Construction contracts: Construction contracts that specify rebar from affected countries should be reviewed for price-escalation provisions, material-substitution rights, and force-majeure clauses that may apply if the duty rates make the specified rebar uneconomical.

Importer-of-record responsibility: Contracts should clearly allocate importer-of-record responsibility and the associated duty liability.

Turkish-American Business Context

Turkish construction companies, developers, and contractors operating in the United States that use rebar from Bulgaria, Egypt, or Vietnam should immediately assess their exposure. Turkey is a significant steel producer, and Turkish rebar is not currently subject to these proceedings — Turkish-origin rebar may be a viable substitute for affected products, subject to applicable Section 232 steel tariffs.

Turkish companies that import rebar from affected countries for use in U.S. construction projects should review their entries from March 13, 2026 and assess their customs bond sufficiency.

This article is based on publicly available Commerce Department announcements. It does not constitute legal advice. The Federal Register version should be consulted for formal deadlines and scope language.

Explore Topics

#Commerce#Antidumping#CVD#Rebar#Steel#Bulgaria#Egypt#Vietnam#Trade Remedy#USITC#Construction#Import Duties

Share this article

X
ULF New York Bülteni

ABD Hukuk Rehberlerini
Doğrudan Alın

E-posta adresiniz yalnızca ULF New York hukuki içerikleri için kullanılır. İstediğiniz zaman aboneliğinizi iptal edebilirsiniz.

Related analysis and guides

Further Reading

Regulatory Monitoring6 min read

Commerce Issues Final Antidumping Order on Korean Monomers and Oligomers: Supply Chain and Contract Implications for Chemical Importers

The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a final antidumping duty order covering specified multifunctional acrylate and methacrylate monomers and epoxy-acrylate oligomers from South Korea, with rates ranging from 65.72% to 155.42% — creating immediate supply chain and contract review obligations for chemical importers and UV-curable raw material purchasers.

Read article
Trade & Customs3 min read

Trade Remedy Actions Target Polypropylene Packaging from Vietnam and Turkish Steel Pipe: What Importers and Supply Chain Participants Need to Know

The ITC determined that U.S. industry is materially injured by polypropylene corrugated boxes from Vietnam sold at less than fair value, clearing the way for antidumping duties. Separately, Commerce initiated AD/CVD administrative reviews covering large diameter welded pipe from Türkiye and other categories. Importers, exporters, and supply chain participants should review HTSUS classification, cash-deposit exposure, and administrative-review deadlines.

Read article
Regulatory Monitoring5 min read

FCC Proposes Banning Importation and Marketing of Specified Foreign-Made Drones: Nine Manufacturers Targeted on National-Security Grounds

The FCC has proposed withdrawing continued importation and marketing authority for specified unmanned-aircraft equipment associated with nine manufacturers — Cogito, Fikaxo, Lyno Dynamics, Skyhigh Tech, Spatial Hover, SZ Knowact, WaveGo, Xtra, and XAG — based on national-security determinations. The proposal would not prohibit continued operation of equipment already purchased. Comments are due 30 days after Federal Register publication; if finalized as proposed, affected importation and marketing would generally have to cease within 30 days of the final action.

Read article
Regulatory Monitoring6 min read

OFAC Targets Strait of Hormuz Maritime-Insurance Scheme and Additional Shadow-Fleet Vessels: Secondary-Sanctions Risk and Crypto Payment Exposure

OFAC designated Persian Gulf Marine Insurance Company and HormuzSafe Marine Services Authority for their alleged roles in an IRGC-backed scheme requiring vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz to purchase compulsory maritime insurance. Treasury notes that HormuzSafe accepts Bitcoin and other digital assets. OFAC also designated vessel owners, managers, and eight vessels connected with Iran's petroleum trade, with certain parties expressly identified as presenting secondary-sanctions risk.

Read article

Published

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

Back to Publications