All Publications
6 min read

OFAC Imposes Its Largest Sanctions Action Against the CJNG Network: Compliance Obligations for Banks, Importers, and Energy Companies | ULF New York

Regulatory Monitoring

OFAC Imposes Its Largest Sanctions Action Against the CJNG Network: Compliance Obligations for Banks, Importers, and Energy Companies

OFAC has sanctioned more than 50 Mexican individuals and entities linked to the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generación under both narcotics and counterterrorism authorities, blocking property within U.S. jurisdiction and triggering immediate rescreening obligations for banks, importers, energy companies, and logistics operators.

6 min read

Action Overview

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control has imposed what it describes as its largest sanctions action to date against the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generación — commonly known as CJNG — network. The action designates more than 50 Mexican individuals and entities under both narcotics trafficking authorities and counterterrorism authorities, specifically Executive Order 13224, which targets individuals and organizations that commit, threaten to commit, or support acts of terrorism.

The designated network spans a wide range of commercial sectors, including:

  • Construction
  • Agriculture
  • Tequila and agave production
  • Fuel retail and petroleum services
  • Logistics and transportation
  • Clothing and furniture manufacturing
  • Private security

Legal Framework and Immediate Consequences

Property Blocking

All property and interests in property of designated individuals and entities that are within the United States or within the possession or control of U.S. persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in.

The 50-Percent Ownership Rule

OFAC's 50-percent rule applies: entities owned 50 percent or more — directly or indirectly — by one or more designated persons are themselves blocked, even if not separately listed on the SDN List. This rule significantly expands the practical scope of the designation beyond the named parties.

Prohibited Transactions

U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with designated parties. This includes payments, deliveries, contract performance, insurance coverage, and the release of any blocked property.

Secondary Sanctions Exposure

Because many targets were also designated under Executive Order 13224 — the counterterrorism authority — participating foreign financial institutions may face secondary sanctions exposure. This means non-U.S. banks and financial institutions that knowingly facilitate significant transactions for designated parties risk being cut off from the U.S. financial system, even if they have no direct U.S. nexus to the underlying transaction.

Sector-Specific Compliance Obligations

Banks and Payment Providers

Financial institutions must immediately rescreen all Mexican counterparties, beneficial owners, payment intermediaries, and correspondent relationships. Potential matches must be escalated before any payment is processed or released. Existing account relationships with Mexican businesses in the designated sectors — construction, agriculture, tequila, fuel, logistics — require enhanced due diligence and beneficial ownership verification.

Importers and Distributors

Companies importing goods from Mexico — particularly agricultural products, tequila and agave derivatives, fuel, clothing, and furniture — must verify that their Mexican suppliers, distributors, and freight forwarders are not designated or 50-percent-owned by designated parties. Supply chain due diligence should extend to sub-suppliers and logistics intermediaries.

Energy Companies

Petroleum services companies, fuel retailers, and energy infrastructure operators with Mexican operations or counterparties face heightened exposure given the explicit designation of petroleum-sector entities. Contracts with Mexican fuel suppliers, service providers, and joint venture partners should be reviewed for sanctions representations, beneficial-ownership disclosure requirements, and suspension or termination rights triggered by designation.

Construction Companies

U.S. and international construction firms with Mexican projects, subcontractors, or material suppliers must rescreen their entire Mexican supply chain. Construction is explicitly named in the designated network, and the 50-percent rule means that a designated individual's ownership interest in a subcontractor — even a minority stake — can trigger blocking obligations.

Agricultural and Beverage Businesses

The designation of tequila, agave, and agricultural entities creates specific risks for U.S. importers of Mexican spirits, food products, and agricultural commodities. Importers should verify the ownership structure of their Mexican suppliers and request updated beneficial ownership certifications.

Logistics Operators

Transportation and logistics companies moving goods across the U.S.–Mexico border must rescreen carriers, freight forwarders, customs brokers, and warehousing operators. The designation of logistics entities within the CJNG network means that routine cross-border shipments may inadvertently involve blocked parties.

Insurers

Insurance companies providing coverage to U.S. businesses with Mexican operations or counterparties must review their underwriting and claims procedures to ensure that coverage is not extended to blocked parties or transactions.

Contract Review Priorities

Existing contracts with Mexican counterparties should be reviewed for:

  1. Sanctions representations and warranties — Does the counterparty represent that it is not a designated party and that no designated party holds a 50-percent or greater ownership interest?
  2. Beneficial ownership disclosure — Does the contract require ongoing disclosure of ownership changes?
  3. Suspension and termination rights — Does the contract permit suspension of performance or termination without penalty if a counterparty becomes designated?
  4. Blocked-property procedures — Does the contract address what happens to payments, goods, or services if a party becomes blocked mid-performance?
  5. Indemnification — Who bears the cost of compliance failures, delayed shipments, or contract termination resulting from a sanctions designation?

Practical Steps

Immediate (within 24–48 hours):

  • Run all Mexican counterparties, beneficial owners, and payment intermediaries through OFAC's SDN List and the Consolidated Sanctions List
  • Apply the 50-percent rule to any entity with Mexican ownership
  • Escalate potential matches to compliance counsel before processing any pending transactions

Short-term (within 30 days):

  • Update onboarding and KYC procedures to require enhanced beneficial ownership disclosure for Mexican counterparties in the designated sectors
  • Review and update sanctions representations in existing contracts
  • Brief operations, procurement, and accounts-payable teams on the new designations and the sectors affected

Ongoing:

  • Implement automated rescreening triggers for any ownership change notification from Mexican counterparties
  • Monitor OFAC for follow-on designations — large network actions typically generate additional designations as investigations continue
  • Review insurance coverage for sanctions exclusions and ensure that claims procedures address blocked-property scenarios

Implications for Turkish Companies Operating in the U.S.

Turkish companies with U.S. operations that source goods from Mexico, use Mexican logistics providers, or have Mexican joint venture partners face the same compliance obligations as U.S.-headquartered companies. The key exposure points are:

  • Procurement: Mexican raw materials, components, or finished goods passing through U.S. customs
  • Logistics: Mexican freight forwarders or carriers used for U.S.-bound shipments
  • Financial transactions: Payments routed through U.S. correspondent banks for Mexican counterparties
  • Insurance: U.S.-placed insurance policies covering Mexican operations or shipments

Because the secondary sanctions authority under Executive Order 13224 can reach non-U.S. financial institutions, Turkish banks facilitating significant transactions for CJNG-linked entities also face potential exposure, even without a direct U.S. nexus.

This article is based on publicly available OFAC designations and Federal Register materials. It does not constitute legal advice. Businesses with specific compliance questions should consult qualified sanctions counsel.

Explore Topics

#OFAC#Sanctions#CJNG#Mexico#AML#Compliance#Executive Order 13224#Secondary Sanctions#Financial Crime#Supply Chain

Share this article

X
ULF New York Bülteni

ABD Hukuk Rehberlerini
Doğrudan Alın

E-posta adresiniz yalnızca ULF New York hukuki içerikleri için kullanılır. İstediğiniz zaman aboneliğinizi iptal edebilirsiniz.

Related analysis and guides

Further Reading

Regulatory Monitoring6 min read

OFAC Targets Strait of Hormuz Maritime-Insurance Scheme and Additional Shadow-Fleet Vessels: Secondary-Sanctions Risk and Crypto Payment Exposure

OFAC designated Persian Gulf Marine Insurance Company and HormuzSafe Marine Services Authority for their alleged roles in an IRGC-backed scheme requiring vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz to purchase compulsory maritime insurance. Treasury notes that HormuzSafe accepts Bitcoin and other digital assets. OFAC also designated vessel owners, managers, and eight vessels connected with Iran's petroleum trade, with certain parties expressly identified as presenting secondary-sanctions risk.

Read article
Regulatory Updates6 min read

OFAC Removes 84 Entries and Consolidates 18 Duplicates in Sanctions List Modernization: Compliance Teams Must Distinguish True Delistings from Administrative Deletions

OFAC has removed 84 individuals and entities and enhanced identifying information for 22 list entries as part of its sanctions-modernization initiative. OFAC also consolidated 18 duplicate entries — administrative deletions that do not constitute true delistings, as the underlying persons and property remain sanctioned under retained entries. Banks, multinationals, and screening providers must promptly refresh databases and carefully distinguish genuine removals from administrative consolidations.

Read article
Regulatory Monitoring6 min read

Commerce Issues Final Antidumping Order on Korean Monomers and Oligomers: Supply Chain and Contract Implications for Chemical Importers

The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a final antidumping duty order covering specified multifunctional acrylate and methacrylate monomers and epoxy-acrylate oligomers from South Korea, with rates ranging from 65.72% to 155.42% — creating immediate supply chain and contract review obligations for chemical importers and UV-curable raw material purchasers.

Read article
Regulatory Monitoring6 min read

Commerce Issues Final Rebar Antidumping and CVD Determinations for Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam: Rates Up to 136.57% with USITC Injury Review Pending

The U.S. Department of Commerce issued final affirmative antidumping and countervailing duty determinations covering steel concrete reinforcing bar from Bulgaria, Egypt, and Vietnam. Rates range from 23.27% (Egypt CVD) to 136.57% (Vietnam-wide antidumping entity). These are final Commerce determinations, not yet final duty orders — the USITC must still make affirmative injury determinations, generally within 45 days, before orders can be issued. Antidumping suspension of liquidation generally covers entries made on or after March 13, 2026.

Read article

Published

Tuesday, July 28, 2026

Back to Publications